TDD Red-Green Loop
Build a feature test first: write one failing test per acceptance criterion, make it pass with minimal code, refactor, and move on to the next one.
Copy the TDD Red-Green Loop loop
Stops when every acceptance criterion has a passing test and the full suite is green, or after 12 iterations. Edit the settings block, then paste the whole prompt into your agent.
You are running the "TDD Red-Green Loop". Settings (edit before running): - Feature spec: <paste the ticket, user story, or acceptance criteria here> - Test command: npm test - Max iterations (criteria cycles): 12 Goal: implement the spec one tested behavior at a time. Before the loop: rewrite the spec as a numbered list of small, independently testable behaviors. Show the list and keep it updated. Each iteration: 1. Red: write one test for the next unchecked behavior. Run it and confirm it fails, and that the failure message matches the missing behavior (not a typo or import error). 2. Green: write the smallest amount of production code that makes this test pass. Run the full suite. 3. Refactor: improve names and remove duplication in code you touched. Run the full suite again. 4. Check the behavior off the list and note the test name. Stop when: - Every behavior on the list is checked and the full suite passes. Success. - You reach the max iteration count. - A behavior is ambiguous or contradicts another. Stop and ask instead of guessing. Rules: - Never write production code for a behavior before its test has failed. - Do not modify earlier tests to make a new one pass unless the spec changed. If so, say why. - Keep one behavior per iteration. Do not batch. - Do not add dependencies without saying why. Final report: the checked list with test names, files changed, and any open questions about the spec.
When this loop fits
- You have a clear spec or ticket with acceptance criteria and want the agent to implement it safely.
- You are adding behavior to fragile code and want each step locked in by a test.
- You want an agent to produce code that is reviewable criterion by criterion.
What happens on each pass
The agent repeats these steps until the stop condition holds or it runs out of iterations.
- List the criteria. Turn the spec into a numbered list of small, testable behaviors.
- Red. Write one test for the next behavior and run it to confirm it fails for the expected reason.
- Green. Write the minimum code that makes the new test pass without breaking any other test.
- Refactor. Clean up duplication and naming while the suite stays green.
- Next criterion. Tick the criterion off and repeat until the list is done.
MCP servers for this loop
The 6 strongest of 749 matching servers, ranked by how closely they fit and then by trust score.
- 55Trust score 55 of 100, Fair
Deterministic eligibility decisions and test-driven rule authoring via the Aethis developer API.
RegistryLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: Not graded. No license is recorded for this server.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: Not graded. No commit or release date has been recorded. - 55Trust score 55 of 100, Fair
Checks whether your streaming redactor leaks a secret split across chunks; writes a pytest for it.
RegistryLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: Not graded. No license is recorded for this server.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: Not graded. No commit or release date has been recorded. - 50Trust score 50 of 100, Fair
Elixium AI — XP-native agile platform. TDD-gated stories, team decisions, learning loop.
RegistryLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: Not graded. No license is recorded for this server.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: Not graded. No commit or release date has been recorded. - 49Trust score 49 of 100, Fair
GodPrompt MCP Server
by akzar1el · TypeScript
GodPrompt MCP + Agent Skill for coding agents with TDD, debugging, verification, and task routing.
RegistryRemoteLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: A. MIT is a permissive open source license.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: A. Last commit or release 11 days ago. - 46Trust score 46 of 100, Fair
build
by dave-london · TypeScript
Auto-detects test framework (pytest, jest, vitest) and returns structured results.
RegistryLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: A. MIT is a permissive open source license.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: A. Last commit or release 10 days ago. - 42Trust score 42 of 100, Fair
Generates unit tests for Python code with coverage before/after reports and concrete edge cases.
RegistryRemoteLicenseQualityMaintenanceLicense: Not graded. No license is recorded for this server.Quality: Not graded. No README or tool list has been captured yet.Maintenance: Not graded. No commit or release date has been recorded.
How to run this loop
- Connect the tools. Install a server the loop can use, for example aethis-mcp, or rely on your agent's built-in terminal and file access.
- Edit the settings block. Replace the example commands, targets, and limits with your project's own. Keep the iteration cap low on the first run.
- Paste it into an agent session. Start a fresh session in Claude Code, Cursor, or VS Code agent mode, in the repository root, and paste the prompt.
- Review before you merge. Read the final report and the diff. The loop leaves its work for you to review rather than shipping it.
TDD Red-Green Loop questions
When does the TDD Red-Green Loop loop stop?
It stops as soon as every acceptance criterion has a passing test and the full suite is green. It also stops after 12 iterations by default, or earlier when the prompt's own stop rules say it is stuck, and then reports what changed and what is left. Change the cap in the settings block at the top of the prompt.
Why use test-driven development with a coding agent?
Agents are good at making code pass a test and bad at knowing when they are done. Writing the failing test first gives each step a clear finish line, keeps changes small, and leaves a test suite that documents exactly what was built.
Why must the test fail for the expected reason?
A test that fails because of a typo or a missing import proves nothing about the feature. Checking the failure message confirms that the test really exercises the missing behavior, so its later pass actually means something.