Silica MCP Server
RTL and FPGA tools: lint, simulate, formal, synthesize, place and route, program a board.
Silica scores 68 (Good), licensed AGPL-3.0 and written in Python. It installs as a local process. It does not declare tools yet. Filed under Uncategorized. GitHub shows 10 stars. Install configs are generated for 10 clients. Being listed in the registry is not the same as being vendor-official.
Good trust
68 of 100 from six public signals. Nobody can buy a point.
- Listed in the official MCP registry.
- OSI-style license: agpl-3.0.
Where the 68 comes from
22 + 20 + 3 + 10 + 10 + 3 = 68. Each factor is capped, so no single signal can carry a listing.
Active in the official MCP registry, plus a known vendor namespace.
Registry: 22 of 30 points.How recently the repository saw a commit or release.
Maintenance: 20 of 20 points.GitHub stars and weekly downloads, on a log scale.
Popularity: 3 of 20 points.A clear, OSI-style open-source license.
License: 10 of 10 points.Not archived, a secure install path, a pinned version.
Security: 10 of 10 points.A real summary, a README with depth, listed tools.
Docs: 3 of 10 points.Install
Pick your client, copy the config, paste it in.
{ "mcpServers": { "simaanc-silica-eda": { "command": "uvx", "args": [ "silica-eda" ] } }}
Environment variables
This server does not declare environment variables.
Tools
All capabilitiesTools show up when the registry metadata or the repository README lists them. GitHub enrichment fills this in when a token is configured.
About
RTL and FPGA tools: lint, simulate, formal, synthesize, place and route, program a board.
FAQ
- What is Silica?
- RTL and FPGA tools: lint, simulate, formal, synthesize, place and route, program a board.
- How do I install Silica?
- Pick a client above and copy the generated config. Cursor and VS Code also have a deep link when the server can run locally or remotely.
- Is Silica official?
- No. Registry-listed is not the same as vendor-official. Read the methodology for the difference.
- How is the trust score calculated?
- This listing scores 68 (Good). The formula is published on the methodology page.
Reviews
No average · 0 publishedNo reviews yet. Used it? Tell the next person how it went.
Sign into review this server.